Sunday, May 3, 2026

STOP the GREEDY Boosters of Box Elder Data Center

UPDATE:  Keep pushing against the corrupt Utah lawmakers who ignored overwhelming public input. 

Republican County Commissioners TRAGICALLY approve Stratos Project today.

Commentary:  Commissioners ignored the clear will of the people who turned out in huge numbers to protest against the Stratos project.  

About 2000 people came to make their voices heard.

Capacity of the arena is 1500 to 2500 depending on whether people sit or stand.

 No one carried a sign in favor of the Stratos project.  


The public meeting started poorly with combative threats from one lecturing and yelling Commissioner. 


He basically opened the meeting with finger-pointing after saying "we won't let the public speak". 

He escalated tensions by then threatening to turn a small army of police officers onto peaceful citizens who were protesting for their clean air, to save the nearly dead Great Salt Lake, and for having a say in a huge decision. 

The lack of public comment prompted some to loudly yell "boo" and "shame". 

Yes, the public could/should have been more polite but surely the thousands of comments in opposition to the Stratos Project might have tipped the commissioners off.      

Citizens are UNDERSTANDABLY unhappy that there has not been NO public comment in an open meeting.  NADA.  

 The Box Elder commission refused to take public comments in this and one prior open meeting because they "claimed" that the public missed its opportunity to speak on April 22.  

Let's examine that claim:  The Agenda for that meeting effectively disguised the Stratos's project scope and impact by allocating only 4 minutes (!!!!!!!!!!!!!).  How could anyone be aware of this enormous project when 4 minutes are allocated to it?

Below see a copy of the agenda setting aside a 4 minutes for this colossal project on April 22nd. 

This was a trick to keep the public from providing input in front of their neighbors. Secret letters to a web site to do not provide the transparency required by state law.  "We have been duped and tricked".  


Actual testimony is here:  The actual time used to discuss of Stratos project ran on for a LONG time.  

May 4th.  Commissioners eventually fled from their constituents. 

Commissioners went to a small room, took no public comments in a public meeting.  

Commissioners seemed to have ignored the thousands of letters they got though a web interface.  

We conclude this because they started the meeting by repeating some of the misleading and debunked talking points from Stratos boosters.   
  • Will those letters from the public become part of the public record?  
    Someone needs to GRAMA all these letters please.

All three commissioners approved the destructive and constantly changing bad plan.  

Two commissioners are up for re-election in November.  Please vote for new leadership.

We can still PREVENT ANOTHER GIANT DATA CENTER

and polluting power plants

    in NW Utah


UPDATES:
Gov Cox has been in belligerent barking mode about the secret deal. See it here

Translation: "We get to push through our destructive pet project but stalllllllll clean energy projects using rules and regs"

Gov Cox was clearly part of a behind-the-scenes dealmaking process starting MONTHS before any public discussion.

  • KEEP LOCAL CONTROL
  • Jobs for People, not Machines!
  • Construction brings man-camps and many ills
    • Before you vote on this project, please ask the sheriff how law enforcement feels about thousands of single young men living in remote Man Camps? Ask the local Health Department how will they handle hundreds of prostitutes coming to tempt the Man Camps? Will they hope that the sexually transmitted infections stay in a bubble in the Man Camps? Or is it possible that the men will cruise into town looking for young women to entertain them?  Mary Da Silva retired Public Nurse
  • We've got your back, county commissioners.

  • BOX ELDER DOESN'T WANT THIS
  • DATA CENTERS POISON UTAH

  • They are Betraying Us: Enriching Themselves

  • How will toxic waste be remediated?
    • Data center produce LOTS of toxic waste


Box Elder County is being cut out of its property taxes by secret deal made behind closed doors:

DATA CENTER PROPERTY TAX:

    •  80% REBATED TO A FOREIGN CELEBRITY. 
    • 20% TO THE STATE AND MIDA. 
    • BOX ELDER COUNTY: ZERO.


YET our Great Salt Lake is in particularly DIRE condition.

Tracker of GrowTheFlow shows it has only 36% full, has more than half its lake bed exposed to wind, is in critical-to-collapsed condition, and headed into a hot summer with 2% or normal snowpack in its drainage basin!
Tracker of Grow the Flow

Tracker of Grow the Flow

Tracker of Grow the Flow




Utah cannot afford such the Stratos project to endanger our state's economy, our public health, our environment, our clean air, or our clean water.

Organizations in opposition: (partial list)

  • HEAL

  • Physicians for a Healthy Environment

  • USU professors

  • Citizens throughout the region.

  • Grow the Flow




Pat BAGLEY explains:



THE PROBLEM:


Caption for map above. 
Blue dots around red polygons are the land for the Statos data center and power plant.  

Red polygons without blue dots illustrate the equivalent amount of land at risk in 4 separate locations.  Residents of Cache Valley, Brigham City area, Ogden area and Salt Lake Valley can compare the amount of land at risk with their local landscapes. 


THE PROBLEM

A major topic affecting our community this week is the proposed Stratos MEGA-data center and the enormous group of GARGANTUAN gas-fired power plants to be sited in western Box Elder County in Hansel Valley and south of CURLEW Valley.  


Many other web sites and resources explain what is going on.


Salt Lake Tribune broke the story and has dug into the topic with many articles (check .sltrib.com for updates coming fast):

https://www.sltrib.com/news/2026/04/25/hyperscale-data-center-may-be/ 

https://www.sltrib.com/news/politics/2026/04/29/blake-moore-karianne-lisonbee/

/https://www.sltrib.com/news/politics/2026/05/01/what-we-know-about-mida-its-link/

https://www.sltrib.com/news/environment/2026/05/01/utahns-send-state-deluge-concerns/

Gov Cox is invested in pushing a risky project on Utah: It would greatly enrich out of state developers and cronies while promising fake benefits to BOX ELDER COUNTY 

https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/editorial/2026/05/01/tribune-editorial-box-elder-county/

https://www.sltrib.com/news/environment/2026/05/01/utahns-send-state-deluge-concerns/

/https://www.sltrib.com/news/environment/2026/03/16/utah-incentives-lure-least-one

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

FIND OUT about the scam:

BEST graphical and DATA summaries of what is happening. ACCESS IT here. EXPLORE this amazing web site. It explains all sorts of issues about this project. There has been an update. Use this version.


@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

ACTION ITEMS modified slightly from GrowtheFlow.org

We Need Your Help

If this proposed development concerns you, here are two immediate ways you can take action:

  1. Formally protest the water rights application tied to this project ($15) [this takes very little time]
    • Go to: https://waterrights.utah.gov/protestOfApplication/protestOfApplication.asp
    • Enter the application number: Water Right 13-4148
      • Click “Get Info”
      • “Change application” will auto-fill under “action to be protested”
    • Fill out your information and your reason for protest
      • You can reference concerns like:
        • Harm to Great Salt Lake and wildlife
          • Harm to entire state's economy and everyone's health if GREAT SALT LAKE is not returned to healthy levels from its current extreme adverse condition.
        • Insufficient water for the project’s scale
        • Lack of clear hydrologic or impact analysis
        • Reliance on unproven assumptions
        • Missing key details like long-term safeguards
        • There is a high water table in part of the site and that water must NOT BE DIVERTED along with surface rights.
    • Submit your protest

2. Make your voice heard at the County Commission meeting

Urge Box Elder County Commissioners to carefully consider the long-term impacts of this project and protect the water resources that Great Salt Lake depends on.

  • When: Monday, May 4
  • TIME of peaceful protest: 3 pm
  • Time of public meeting with no public comment allowed:  4:00 pm
  • Where: BEC Fairgrounds Fine Arts Building (320 N. 1000 W., Tremonton, UT)

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

This site is in earthquake country, would be built on top of a young shield volcano and other cinder cones, and is prone to liquefaction. HAS THAT BEEN CONSIDERED?

Dr. Janecke, Emerita USU, made a quick summary and assessment of geologic hazards here


@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

Another collection of insights is HERE. Northern Utah citizens collected this information.

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

A quasi state entity MIDA - Military Infrastructure Development Authority, in partnership with a private group called Stratos, and a financial front man named Kevin O'Leary, wants to acquire 40,000 acres in Box Elder County to build a 3 gigawatt gas-fired power plant, ramping to 7.5 Gw or 9 Gw (this is a lot - as in, the largest such power plant in the world) to exclusively power a massive data center to be built there.  MIDA made a request to approve an interlocal agreement with Box Elder County on April 22 (see video here); t

The BOX ELDER commission tabled the motion and considered it at a meeting on April 27 (see video here);


Again, the motion was tabled and a meeting is set for May 4, at 4 pm, at the Box Elder Fairgrounds Fine Arts Building, at 4 pm. 


A large number of people showed up for the April 27 meeting, and it is anticipated that many more will be at the May 4th meeting. This request, and many other similar requests nationwide, are receiving considerable regional and national news coverage, and significant push back by local residents and other groups. 

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@


For more information, please go here or here 


SUMMARY ASSESSMENT: 


This project appears to be under-planned, under-researched, poorly justified, chock full of environmental hazards and natural hazards, has large economic risks, was designed to trick Box Elder County into relinquishing their tax revenue, is sneaky, and extremely risky. 


That is why there is a RUSH ORDER.


@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@


What can you do?  By watching the videos and the reports from people who attended, one can determine that the Box Elder county commission was asked about this VERY late in the game - perhaps as late as just a few weeks ago. This is a massive project - billions of dollars of investment, large construction projects with perhaps 1000’s of temporary construction jobs over 3-4 years.  MIDA representatives did not supply backing data for many of their assertions regarding tax revenue, environmental reports, geologic hazards, local and regional air quality and water impacts; and at times provided numbers that are at odds with information most other reputable resources provide regarding jobs and revenue created, environmental impacts, etc. 



  1.  IF you have time and or expertise, you can watch the meetings - at the first meeting the topic is considered from 9-16 min, read this material, and send questions to the commission here. 

  2. Inform the commission about issues

  3. FILE IS PROTEST against change of water permits

  4. Water-rights protest deadline

    Tue, May 5

    File a protest on Application 13-4148 at waterrights.utah.gov$15 per protest. Cite groundwater impact, Locomotive Springs, and Great Salt Lake tributary depletion.

  5. Attend the peaceful rally at 3 pm, Monday May 4, at the Box Elder Fairgrounds, Tremonton. 

  6. The commission is meeting at 4 pm, NO public comments will be allowed, and the commission expects strict decorum regarding any comments from the audience. The commission makes it clear that the meeting is in their chambers. We aim to enable Box Elder county residents to have seating priority.

  7. If you have time, and especially if you live in Box Elder County, please post questions that are relevant to the commission’s decision, please post questions here. They ask to make your questions as detailed as possible.




Personal note, we respect the efforts of the 3 county commissioners.


A tremendous amount of pressure is being placed DELIBERATELY on the 3 county commissioners in order to prevent them from finding out how bad this plan could be for their county. RUSHING is a common strategy when a bad and greedy plan is proposed.


- Commissioners represent a county of 58,000 people with significant suburban encroachment from the south; a large rocketry facility, large amounts of arid land, a complex relationship with the federal and state governments, and private companies, regulated utility companies, Salt Lake City, etc., 


When it comes to land use, water rights, industrial infrastructure, grazing rights, hunting, salt, and phragmites. The folks there have a historical perception of being a rural, quiet place;  within a few weeks they are being pressured by a state entity backed by the governor, the state senate president, at least one of our US senators, to sign onto a project for which the front man is appearing on Fox News, MSN, etc. and where billions may be spent, and where there appears to be few details provided regarding the costs, impacts, extent, etc., of the project.  The original ask for approval was a 9 minute session in a rather uneventful commission meeting, and now they are a center of attention. 


Sign making Saturday and Sunday, Logan,  May 2 and 3.  Final details for time and place to follow.  


Growing Alarm

Pat Bagley | Growing Alarm

Pat Bagley | Growing Alarm


Insights from other projects:


Read about how Dutch are dealing with this problem


POSSIBLE TALKING POINTS:

1 Compare the project specs to buying a house:
  • Imagine deciding on your home purchase and mortgage in a mad rush? Then imagine including planning and committing to an irreversible plan to build the power plant to provide energy for your home because it is off grid. Do all of that in a mad rush at the same time. No one in their right mind would agree to such a plan.  

  • Why should Box Elder County be forced into a decision that is a million times more impactful?

  • Boosters of this effort are trying to force the Box Elder commission to decide on the equivalent of hundreds of thousands of home mortgages and thousands of polluting power plants in a few weeks? It is CRAZY and very risky. 

2) Consider the promise of "no water loss for the Great Salt Lake".

  • BOOSTERS REPORT: A new technology called "Closed-Loop Cooling" will solve the problem:
  • A new technology is being touted with a closed-loop cooling system. 

  • The first time a new technology is implemented there are ALWAYS issues that need to be corrected, trouble-shot, and overcome. 

  • When a new technology is being tried it should be tested on a small project.

  • It is incredibly foolhardy to try out a new technology on an gargantuan project of this scale. 

Closed-loop cooling was touted as having almost zero water loss. 


.......DEFYing THE LAWS OF PHYSICS.



3.  Explore the stunning size of the project:

THE SITE IS ENORMOUS:

If it were a square, it would be 8 miles by 8 miles in size.

Below are some maps to education the public about the footprint of the proposed site.












IF time permits we will transfer the captions over.


4. Understand that RUSHING an irreversible decision is a deliberate tactic to obscure a risky project's major flaws. 

 Rushing a decision is a used-car sales strategy, after all.

Risks of Rushing

While proponents argue that speed saves money, this approach often leads to:

  • High Costs and Rework: Speed-driven decisions can result in 5%–15% higher costs due to necessary rework, as design errors are discovered after construction has begun.

    • Design errors are guaranteed in this project given the inexperienced team in charge. 

    • The main investor is a TV personality, after all.

    • The project leader speaking to the Box Elder Council was an administrative assistant as recently as 2024.

    • Earthquake hazards are considerable and apparently none were acknowledged by boosters.

    • Liquefaction risk could impact the project.

    • Volcanic ash could erupt from one of the volcanoes in and near the site.  The most recent dated eruption spread ash across several valley shortly before Laje Bonneville began to rise. 

  • Safety Hazards: Rushed sites have higher risks of accidents.

  • Lowered Quality: The pressure to finish on time often results in reduced safety checks, design revisions, and overall lower quality of work.


5. UNDERSTAND the objectives behind the rushed schedule for the Box Elder DATA center project:


Risk to RUSHING:   


RUSHING is not a good idea for Box Elder county, for our state, for the Great Salt Lake, for the clean air, or for our water budget in this mega-drought. 


  • RUSHING is almost always intended to prevent scrutiny of faulty plans.


  • RUSHING is often used to pressure decision makers into overlooking issues that could make a project a poor choice for their community. 


  • RUSHING is almost always a strategy for projects with ENORMOUS RISK. 

  •  

  • Boosters exaggerate the possible benefits of projects and make them sound like certainties when in fact they may not come to pass. 


  • Boosters downplay and minimize the many downsides and risks of projects.



6. Power generated with natural gas pollutes the air, water and land.


HELP US TO prevent gas-fired power plants:

Gas Fired Power plants look like this.  NOTE THE POLLUTION.  


UTAH IS THE IDEAL LOCATION FOR CHEAP AND CLEAN SOLAR POWER GENERATION

Solar power looks like this.  It can be placed on urban buildings instead of gobbling up precious land.


7.  The Ruby pipeline may not have the massive amount of gas required for this project!!!!  Wyoming would need to increase their production by 50% from declining gas field. 


8. Other similar projects produced terrible results-as described by speaker in the video.


That is WHY POOR COMMUNITIES ARE TARGETS OF SUCH EFFORTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Polluted water
  • Good paying jobs are promised but do not appear
  • Jobs are often remote
  • Local community suffers
  • Sound pollution   
  • Less water in community
  • Air pollution
  • Light pollution is so bad that night lights are no needed 
  • On site jobs pay less than local average-despite boosters promising the moon
  • Sponsors get rich
  • Everyone else suffers
  • Deceptive promises are common




@moonindetriment Here’s video of me yelling at city council, in honor of this video apparently doing numbers on fbook (I boycott Meta so I had no idea lmao) If you’re in South Jersey and you care about this issue, join Sustain SJ! ✊🏻 #ai #datacenter #community #foryoupage #fyp ♬ original sound - moon in detriment



Friday, May 1, 2026

KNOWLEDGE: RIVER projects in Logan Utah, and its impact on Cache Valley

 ALERT and update!!!!

The Public will soon see the project plans (after 18 months of silence).

PLEASE comment on DRAFT Environmental Impact Statement.

Please advocate for:
  • year round water,
  • at least 10 cfs of summer flow (so kids can continue to go tubing),
  • no new structures placed in the river bed.



Watering lawns with water from our river is unwise in this time of rising temps and mega-drought.

Watch for DRAFT EIS on the web site.

Time is short.

Ask for advice at WethePeopleCV@gmail.com


https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/state-offices/utah/logan-river-watershed-project


Let’s preserve and enhance our priceless amenity:

The Little Logan River

OR

"Treating a cat like a dog won't makes it bark

Dr. Susanne Janecke, Sept 16, 2025





Summary comments about the LOGAN RIVER WATERSHED PROJECT.  

This public works project has laudable goals to update outdated irrigation infrastructure of several canals that divert water north from the Little Logan River. 

Published plans for this project also UNNECESSARILY and very negatively dewater and mismanage the magnificent Little Logan River in our midst, in violation of Utah river law 73-3-29 

Logan, Utah, the Island, the Great Salt Lake, and east Cache Valley area between Hyde Park and the Logan River will all SUFFER from a project. It plans to divert almost all the Little Logan River's water upstream of legal diversion points into pressurized pipes. It also seeks new users that use EXTRA river water to water their lawns, while our beautiful river and the Great Salt Lake dry up.

The Logan River Watershed Project 
must do more to:
+ACTUALLY and FULLY honor the public's rights, 
+preserve rivers and landscapes, 
enhance our fabulous greenbelt of parks, 
+maintain sufficient open flow (>>8 cfs) of natural river water,
+restore winter river water to Logan, Utah’s rivers and Island area,

+and lease unused water rights to help prevent further collapse
of the Great Salt lake and Utah's economy.

KEY POINT:  THE LITTLE LOGAN RIVER IS A NATURAL RIVER--AND THIS EASILY PROVABLE FACT ENTITLES THE PUBLIC TO PROTECTIONS

There is overwhelming evidence that the Little Logan River is a natural river along its entire length.

See the FAQ in this post to see a summary of the evidence that experts use to prove that the river is a river along its entire length.

Problem statement:

The Little Logan River is a natural river, not a man-made canal. Plans to upgrade the canals that are fed by the river will degrade the Little Logan River unless its river status is protected, as required by law since the early 1970s. 

River status gives Little Logan River extra protection. Unfortunately, sponsors of Logan River Watershed Project appear to be planning and managing the Little Logan River as if it were a man-canal that can be modified at will.

A win-win solution is possible with ZERO impact on the water provided to existing or potential water users.  The excess unused water right (~ 45-55 cfs) could keep the Little Logan River healthy and satisfy the law. 


Key to this win-win solution is the fact that the Crockett Canal companies have rights to 140 cfs of river water at peak flows but there have been no users for more than 85 cfs in at least two decades. Records dating back to the 1970s show that the full allotment was NEVER in the Little Logan River on its way to canals. Peak flows have been below 100 cfs since 1997 and below 120 cfs since about 1987.


The large excess right is not being shared with the public that owns the water.

The Logan River Watershed Project is motivated by a desire to spend tax moneys (~135 million dollars) to find new users of the unused water right. 


With FAR TOO FEW USERS of the Crockett water rights, it is remarkable and noteworthy that the sponsors propose an extremely stingy amount of water for the Little Logan River.  


They propose that ZERO water flows in the Little Logan River during droughts and a maximum of 10 cfs during unspecified conditions. 



Grinches all!

TLTLTLTLTLTLTL

Sponsors have erroneously claimed that most of the Little Logan River is a canal. This claim is critical for sponsors to perpetrate the alarming degradation planned, with limited transparency, to our incredible river. (Many updates since October 2024 have not been shared with the public)

The last updated version of the Logan River Watershed Project does not treat the Little Logan river as a river, with required legal protections. It appears that sponsors have barely considered the law or the public’s rights in their planning.


Yet the public was assured REPEATEDLY that the plan for upgrading infrastructure does not damage the Little Logan River. Sadly those assurances never matched with posted documents later posted to describe the project, nor with checks of other facts.  


The Little Logan river will not be healthy unless it has enough water to sustain its current uses, including very popular water sports by families, cooling, environmental functions and fish begin to return to this river. 10-15 cfs guaranteed in the summer along the entire river would accomplish this public benefit. 


The published plan for the Little Logan River promises to limit water flows in the Little Logan River to a very low and worrisome range of ZERO to TEN cfs. 


Sponsors have told us that they are not legally permitted to allow water to continue to flow in the river bed after the irrigation season ends in October.


The assertion/myth/speculation/ of the river being a canal was seemingly never tested against the legal, geologic, regulatory or historic evidence. 


TLTLTLTLTLTLT

 All rivers have additional protections that canals do not have (Utah code 73-3-29).  That law requires that there must be a balance of water rights and the public's rights to recreation, a healthy environment and aquatic species.  

The public rights to a healthy natural river would be well-served if adults were able to tube in the river without going aground (~15 cfs flowing) and winter desiccation ends so that fish can reestablish.  


 Qr code helps you to share the report


By Dr. Susanne Janecke

Updated July 2025

Return to this information portal

Tinyurl.com/savellr 

Tinyurl.com/RESTORELLR


SKIP AHEAD TO A POWERPOINT TALK (5 minutes) about the Little Logan river's precarious future (use find "talk").